Grafton is a town in Grafton County, New Hampshire, United States. The population was 1,385 at the 2020 census. In 2004, Grafton became the focus for libertarians as part of the Free Town Project (a single-town version of the Free State Project). Grafton’s appeal as a favorable destination was due to its absence of zoning laws and a then-low property tax rate. John Babiarz, a Grafton resident and prominent member of the Libertarian Party, encouraged libertarian people to move there.
During this time, the town’s population grew by about 200 people (about 20%); nearly all of the newcomers were men. Project participants did not find themselves as welcome as they had hoped, but they voted in changes including a 30% reduction in the town’s already small budget. This resulted in eliminating funding to the county’s senior-citizens council, town offices going unheated during the winter, poorly maintained roads filled with potholes, and the Grafton Police Department being reduced to one officer (the police chief), who said he was unable to answer calls for service as the town had no money to repair the one police vehicle left.
read more »
Free Town Project
Peppercorn
In legal parlance, a peppercorn is a metaphor for a very small cash payment or other nominal consideration, used to satisfy the requirements for the creation of a legal contract. It is featured in ‘Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestle Co Ltd’ (1960), an important English contract law case where the House of Lords stated that ‘a peppercorn does not cease to be good consideration if it is established that the promisee does not like pepper and will throw away the corn.’ However, the cited passage is mere dicta, and not the basis for the decision.
In English law, and other countries with similar common law systems, a binding legal contract requires that each party must provide consideration. In other words, each party will give something of value to the other party for the contract to be considered binding. The situation is different under contracts within civil law jurisdictions because such nominal consideration can be categorized as a disguised gift.
read more »



